Business

Nomination vs Will: Why Both Are Essential for Estate Planning

AI Notice: Content is aggregated and summarized using Artificial Intelligence. Details may contain inaccuracies. Please verify facts independently before making financial or investment decisions.

Many people assume that naming someone as a nominee means that person will automatically become the owner of the money or investment after their death. That assumption can create serious problems later. A nomination and a Will serve different purposes, and one cannot always replace the other.

A nominee is primarily the person authorised to receive or claim an asset after the account holder's death. This can make the transmission process easier for the bank, mutual fund or other institution holding the asset. But the nominee may not necessarily be the person who ultimately has the right to inherit that asset.

A Will works differently. It records how a person wants their assets to be distributed after death. Subject to applicable succession laws and legal requirements, a valid Will can set out who should receive specific assets or portions of the estate. It can also reduce confusion when a family has multiple heirs or when the asset holder wants to distribute wealth differently from the default succession rules.

The distinction has been reinforced in the securities market. SEBI's current nomination framework for demat accounts and mutual fund folios states that nominees receive the deceased investor's assets as trustees and on behalf of the legal heirs. The framework also allows investors to nominate up to three people for eligible single-held accounts and folios, subject to the applicable rules.

This means a nominee can be important even when a Will exists. If something happens to the account holder, a properly recorded nominee can help the institution process the claim or transmission. Without a nominee, the family may face a more complicated process involving documents such as a Will, legal heir proof or other succession-related documents, depending on the asset and the institution's rules.

The Will, however, is what communicates the person's broader wishes about inheritance. Imagine a parent names one child as nominee for a mutual fund account but leaves a Will dividing the estate equally between two children. The nominee may receive the investment for transmission purposes, but that does not automatically mean the nominee is entitled to keep the entire asset.

This is why nomination details should not be treated as a substitute for estate planning. A nominee may die before the account holder, family circumstances may change or a nominee may no longer be the person the account holder wants to assist with the claim. Reviewing nominations after marriage, divorce, the birth of a child or a death in the family is sensible.

The same principle applies across different financial products, although the legal effect of nomination can vary depending on the asset and the governing law. Life insurance, bank deposits, securities and other investments should therefore not all be assumed to follow exactly the same rules.

A practical approach is to keep nominations updated across financial accounts and prepare a Will that clearly reflects how you want your assets distributed. The two documents should work together rather than contradict one another.

A nomination can help your family find and claim your money. A Will can help determine how your estate should ultimately be divided. Treating them as the same thing may seem convenient today, but it can leave your family with unnecessary confusion and disputes later.

Discover the latestBusiness News,Sensex, andNiftyupdates. ObtainPersonal Financeinsights, tax queries, and expert opinions onMoneycontrolor download theMoneycontrol Appto stay updated!

Find the best of Al News in one place, specially curated for you every weekend.

Stay on top of the latest tech trends and biggest startup news.